Weather+Report+Video+Rubric

(Pts x ½, max. 5 pts) || Planning time is used effectively. All students contribute to the discussion and all are listened to respectfully. All team members contribute a fair share of the work. || Planning time is used effectively. Most students contribute to the discussion and are listened to respectfully. All team members contribute a fair share of the work. || Planning time is used somewhat effectively. Most students contribute to the discussion and are listened to respectfully. All team members contribute a fair share of the work. || Meetings are seldom, and planning time is used ineffectively. Most students contribute to the discussion, but do not show respect or constructive communication. Division of work is not fair. || Meetings are not held AND/OR some team members do not contribute a fair share of the work. || Report is focused solely on facts. || Visual aid is confusing or very simple, but still readable. Very few weather symbols used, or three used incorrectly. Reporter is visibly nervous in front of camera or difficult to understand. Report is bare reporting of facts in monotone. || Visual aid is difficult to read and understand. Weather symbols are absent or used improperly. Reporter cannot be understood. Facts are clearly inaccurate. ||
 * __Weather Report Video Rubric__**
 * || 10-9 pts. || 8-7 pts. || 6-5 pts. || 4-3 pts. || 2-1 pts. ||
 * Teamwork
 * Content || Students show clear and accurate knowledge of weather information. Scientific vocabulary is cited frequently and accurately, interpretations of data are strongly justified, and predictions are strongly justified with data and logic. || Students show knowledge of weather information. Scientific vocabulary is cited often and accurately, but occasionally replaced with personal description. Interpretations and predictions use data to justify, but may show some flaws in logic. || Students show some knowledge of weather information. Scientific vocabulary is used infrequently, and/or one or two words are used inaccurately. Connections between interpretation/ prediction and data is provided but unclear. || Students show little knowledge of weather information. Scientific knowledge is frequently replaced with personal descriptions and/or several terms are used incorrectly. Connections between interpretation/ prediction and data is provided, but unclear. || Students show minimal knowledge of weather information. No scientific terms, but personal descriptions provided. No provided connection between interpretation/ prediction and data. ||
 * Presentation || Visual aid is clear, accurate, and detailed. Appropriate use of weather map symbols. Reporter speaks clearly and confidently. Report is entertaining and factual. || Visual aid is clear and accurate, but may not be extremely detailed. Mostly appropriate use of weather map symbols. Reporter speaks clearly and confidently. Report is factual and mostly entertaining. || Visual aid is somewhat confusing or overly simple. Few weather symbols used, or one/two used incorrectly. Reporter pauses or stammers frequently.